Educational use only. Not financial, investment, tax or legal advice.

Trading 212 vs Prosper: which should you pick?

Both are FCA-regulated and FSCS-protected. The real difference is fees, account types and how each platform feels to use. Verified against each provider’s published charges.

Fees verified July 2026. Capital at risk. Information, not financial advice.

The quick answer

Choose Trading 212 if...

Cost-conscious DIY investors who want to keep every fee at zero.

Choose Prosper if...

Index fund investors who want the lowest possible total cost and are comfortable with a newer app.

Which of these two fits you?

Tick what you need. No account, no email. The answer is on this page.

Account types you need

Tick what you need above and we'll tell you which of the two covers it.

Account availability verified July 2026. Capital at risk. Information, not financial advice.

What customers say

Trading 2124.6

Reviewers consistently rate the app as easy to use and good value, and many mention the competitive interest paid on uninvested cash.

The most common criticisms are slow identity verification for new accounts and support that can take time to respond.

Read Trading 212 reviews on Trustpilot

Prosper4.6

Early adopters praise the zero fees and responsive founding team; roughly 84% of reviews are five stars.

The review base is small and some users want more account types and a web version.

Read Prosper reviews on Trustpilot

Fees side by side

FeeTrading 212Prosper
Platform fee£0£0
Share dealing£0 commissionNot applicable (funds and ETFs)
Fund dealingETFs only, £0 commissionFree
FX fee0.15%None on GBP fund classes
Stocks & Shares ISAFreeFree
SIPPFreeFree
WithdrawalsFreeFree
Minimum to start£1No minimum

The longer view

Trading 212 built its name on removing fees. There is no platform fee, no dealing commission and no account charge on its ISA or SIPP. The only cost most investors pay is a 0.15% currency conversion fee when buying shares priced in dollars or euros.

The trade-off is scope. You can hold shares and ETFs but not traditional funds, and support is app-based. For an investor who wants a global tracker ETF inside an ISA at close to zero cost, it is very hard to beat on price.

Prosper's pitch is the cheapest total cost of ownership in the UK: no platform fee, no dealing fees, and refunded fund fees on a list of mainstream index funds. For a straightforward global tracker in an ISA or SIPP, the all-in cost really can be zero.

The counterweight is maturity. It is a young platform with a small (if very positive) review base and no individual shares. If that trade-off suits you, the price is unbeatable.

Trading 212 vs Prosper: common questions

It depends on what you hold and how often you trade. Trading 212's platform fee is £0, against £0 at Prosper. On dealing, Trading 212 charges £0 commission for shares and eTFs only, £0 commission for funds, while Prosper charges not applicable (funds and ETFs) for shares and free for funds. Fees verified July 2026.

Other comparisons worth a look

Picked one? Here's the next question.

Trading 212 or Prosper, the account is the easy part. What decides when you can retire is how much goes in and for how long. Delphina works that out from what you already hold and what you pay in each month.

Free to check. No card required. Takes about two minutes.