Educational use only. Not financial, investment, tax or legal advice.

Trading 212 vs IG: which should you pick?

Both are FCA-regulated and FSCS-protected. The real difference is fees, account types and how each platform feels to use. Verified against each provider’s published charges.

Fees verified July 2026. Capital at risk. Information, not financial advice.

The quick answer

Choose Trading 212 if...

Cost-conscious DIY investors who want to keep every fee at zero.

Choose IG if...

Active investors who want professional tools alongside long-term holdings.

Which of these two fits you?

Tick what you need. No account, no email. The answer is on this page.

Account types you need

Tick what you need above and we'll tell you which of the two covers it.

Account availability verified July 2026. Capital at risk. Information, not financial advice.

What customers say

Trading 2124.6

Reviewers consistently rate the app as easy to use and good value, and many mention the competitive interest paid on uninvested cash.

The most common criticisms are slow identity verification for new accounts and support that can take time to respond.

Read Trading 212 reviews on Trustpilot

IG3.8

Experienced traders rate the platform quality, charting and market access.

Lower scores than rivals, with complaints about account queries and the complexity of the product range.

Read IG reviews on Trustpilot

Fees side by side

FeeTrading 212IG
Platform fee£0£0 (custody fee removed January 2026)
Share dealing£0 commission£0 commission with instant currency conversion
Fund dealingETFs only, £0 commissionNot available (shares and ETFs only)
FX fee0.15%0.7%
Stocks & Shares ISAFreeFree
SIPPFreeAvailable, third-party administration fees apply
WithdrawalsFreeFree
Minimum to start£1No minimum

The longer view

Trading 212 built its name on removing fees. There is no platform fee, no dealing commission and no account charge on its ISA or SIPP. The only cost most investors pay is a 0.15% currency conversion fee when buying shares priced in dollars or euros.

The trade-off is scope. You can hold shares and ETFs but not traditional funds, and support is app-based. For an investor who wants a global tracker ETF inside an ISA at close to zero cost, it is very hard to beat on price.

IG is best known for trading, but its share dealing account and ISA became far more competitive in 2026 when it removed custody fees and commissions. You get institutional-quality tools with no platform charge.

The 0.7% currency conversion fee is the main cost to watch on US shares, and there are no traditional funds. It suits confident investors; beginners will find simpler homes elsewhere.

Trading 212 vs IG: common questions

It depends on what you hold and how often you trade. Trading 212's platform fee is £0, against £0 (custody fee removed January 2026) at IG. On dealing, Trading 212 charges £0 commission for shares and eTFs only, £0 commission for funds, while IG charges £0 commission with instant currency conversion for shares and not available (shares and ETFs only) for funds. Fees verified July 2026.

Other comparisons worth a look

Picked one? Here's the next question.

Trading 212 or IG, the account is the easy part. What decides when you can retire is how much goes in and for how long. Delphina works that out from what you already hold and what you pay in each month.

Free to check. No card required. Takes about two minutes.