Educational use only. Not financial, investment, tax or legal advice.

IG vs Scottish Widows: which should you pick?

Both are FCA-regulated and FSCS-protected. The real difference is fees, account types and how each platform feels to use. Verified against each provider’s published charges.

Fees verified July 2026. Capital at risk. Information, not financial advice.

The quick answer

Choose IG if...

Active investors who want professional tools alongside long-term holdings.

Choose Scottish Widows if...

Self-directed investors who want low-cost, no-platform-fee share dealing from a major UK bank.

Which of these two fits you?

Tick what you need. No account, no email. The answer is on this page.

Account types you need

Tick what you need above and we'll tell you which of the two covers it.

Account availability verified July 2026. Capital at risk. Information, not financial advice.

What customers say

IG3.8

Experienced traders rate the platform quality, charting and market access.

Lower scores than rivals, with complaints about account queries and the complexity of the product range.

Read IG reviews on Trustpilot

Scottish Widows4.6

Long-standing customers value the low flat-fee share dealing and the Lloyds Banking Group backing; recent reviews praise the move into the Scottish Widows app.

Common gripes are the 1.5% FX fee on US shares and the dated feel of parts of the web platform.

Read Scottish Widows reviews on Trustpilot

Fees side by side

FeeIGScottish Widows
Platform fee£0 (custody fee removed January 2026)£0 on ISA and Share Dealing Account; SIPP 0.25% capped at £16.50/month
Share dealing£0 commission with instant currency conversion£5.00 per UK trade (£0 commission on international, 1.5% FX applies)
Fund dealingNot available (shares and ETFs only)£5.00 per trade
FX fee0.7%1.5%
Stocks & Shares ISAFreeNo annual charge
SIPPAvailable, third-party administration fees apply0.25% per year, capped at £198
WithdrawalsFreeFree (CHAPS same-day payment £25)
Minimum to startNo minimum£50

The longer view

IG is best known for trading, but its share dealing account and ISA became far more competitive in 2026 when it removed custody fees and commissions. You get institutional-quality tools with no platform charge.

The 0.7% currency conversion fee is the main cost to watch on US shares, and there are no traditional funds. It suits confident investors; beginners will find simpler homes elsewhere.

Scottish Widows Share Dealing is the rebranded IWeb platform, now run by Halifax Share Dealing Limited inside Lloyds Banking Group. It charges no annual fee on the ISA or General Investment Account, £5 per UK trade and free regular investing through a Regular Investment Plan. For a buy-and-hold investor making occasional trades, the all-in cost can be very low.

The trade-off is the 1.5% FX charge on US and other non-GBP trades, which adds up quickly for global investors, and no Junior ISA. The SIPP is competitively priced at 0.25% capped at £16.50 a month. Compare it against Trading 212 or Freetrade if FX cost matters, and against AJ Bell or Hargreaves Lansdown if you want funds and full-service support.

IG vs Scottish Widows: common questions

It depends on what you hold and how often you trade. IG's platform fee is £0 (custody fee removed January 2026), against £0 on ISA and Share Dealing Account; SIPP 0.25% capped at £16.50/month at Scottish Widows. On dealing, IG charges £0 commission with instant currency conversion for shares and not available (shares and ETFs only) for funds, while Scottish Widows charges £5.00 per UK trade (£0 commission on international, 1.5% FX applies) for shares and £5.00 per trade for funds. Fees verified July 2026.

Other comparisons worth a look

Picked one? Here's the next question.

IG or Scottish Widows, the account is the easy part. What decides when you can retire is how much goes in and for how long. Delphina works that out from what you already hold and what you pay in each month.

Free to check. No card required. Takes about two minutes.