Educational use only. Not financial, investment, tax or legal advice.

Moneybox vs Nutmeg (now J.P. Morgan Personal Investing): which one to pick

Both are common first homes for a UK Stocks and Shares ISA, one app-led and one portfolio-led.

Information, not financial advice. Prices and terms change; check each provider before you buy.

Verdict at a glance

Pick Moneybox if

Pick Moneybox if you're just starting to invest, like round-ups and want a Lifetime ISA in the same app.

Pick Nutmeg (now J.P. Morgan Personal Investing) if

Pick Nutmeg (now J.P. Morgan Personal Investing) if you want a managed portfolio run for you and you're happy paying a percentage for it.

How we compared: published fees, account types and review scores for each, verified against the provider’s own price pages.

The short version

Moneybox suits smaller regular savers and Lifetime ISA users; Nutmeg suits larger balances where the percentage fee beats a flat monthly charge. Neither models your pension, tax position or spending alongside the pot.

Why people compare them

Both are common first homes for a UK Stocks and Shares ISA, one app-led and one portfolio-led.

Price and fit, side by side

Moneybox and Nutmeg (now J.P. Morgan Personal Investing) compared feature by feature.
Cheapest paid planMoneybox£1 per monthNutmeg (now J.P. Morgan Personal Investing)0.75% a year per aum
Free tierMoneyboxNoNutmeg (now J.P. Morgan Personal Investing)No
Billed in poundsMoneyboxYesNutmeg (now J.P. Morgan Personal Investing)Yes
Best forMoneyboxPeople starting to invest who want the round-up habit and a Lifetime ISA in the same appNutmeg (now J.P. Morgan Personal Investing)People who want a managed portfolio run for them and are happy to pay a percentage for it

Where Moneybox wins

  • Properly UK: Cash ISA, Stocks and Shares ISA, Lifetime ISA, GIA and pension all in one place
  • Round-ups genuinely get people saving who otherwise would not
  • Pension accounts carry no monthly subscription fee, and the platform fee tapers above £100,000

Where Nutmeg (now J.P. Morgan Personal Investing) wins

  • Genuinely managed portfolios, so you are buying a decision rather than a dashboard
  • The backing of J.P. Morgan, which removes a lot of the platform risk worry
  • A clear published fee schedule with no set-up, exit or trading charges

Where both fall short

  • Neither projects far enough forward to answer a long-term question.

If neither is quite right

If what you actually want is the retirement answer rather than a better dashboard, that is the gap Delphina was built for: UK pensions, ISAs and tax, projected to the age you want to stop. It does not do the job Moneybox does for people starting to invest who want the round-up habit and a lifetime isa in the same app, so if that is the real problem, Moneybox is still the better buy. Free plan is £0, no card.

See how it works

See where you actually stand, free

Track your net worth, assets and a five-year forecast built on your real position, not a guess. Free plan, no card.

See where I stand

Decided? Here’s the next question.

The verdict on the platform is one question. Whether you’re actually saving enough is another, and Delphina answers it from what you already hold and what you pay in each month.

Free. No card required. About two minutes.

Moneybox vs Nutmeg (now J.P. Morgan Personal Investing): common questions

Moneybox is £1 per month and Nutmeg (now J.P. Morgan Personal Investing) is 0.75% a year per aum. Compare the billing period before the number: an annual price and a monthly price are not the same thing.

Compare these individually

Other comparisons