
You are 41. You have a mortgage, a workplace pension you have not looked at in three years, and a current account that never seems to have much in it after the month ends. You wonder, sometimes, if you are doing this right. If everyone else has more saved. If you are behind.
The honest answer is that you cannot know without the numbers. So here are the numbers.
The following figures come from the ONS Wealth and Assets survey, adjusted for the 2024-2025 period. These are median values, meaning half of households in each age group have more, and half have less.
The median means these are the middle figures, not the averages. The average is pulled up by people with significant wealth, so the median is a more honest reflection of what a typical person in each age group has.
These figures include all assets: property equity, pension valuations, savings, investments, and valuables. They subtract all debts: mortgage, loans, credit card balances.
If you are 41 and your net worth is £146,000, you are exactly at the median for your age group. You are doing fine. You are in the middle of the distribution, which means you are not behind. You are typical.
If your net worth is £80,000 at 41, you are below the median. This does not mean you are failing. It means you started later, had a period of unemployment, had children early, or made different choices. The median is a benchmark, not a target.
If your net worth is £300,000 at 41, you are in the top quartile. This is not luck. It is usually a combination of inheritance, property ownership in the right area at the right time, and consistent pension contributions. The people in this position often do not feel wealthy. They feel anxious about whether it is enough. This is a specific kind of anxiety that the top quartile does not escape.
Net worth by age is useful context. It is not the target.
The number that actually matters is whether your current trajectory gets you to a retirement you actually want, at the age you actually want to retire.
Someone with £100,000 at 40 and a clear plan to max their pension contributions for the next 20 years is in a better position than someone with £250,000 at 40 who has been making minimum pension contributions and has no plan.
The comparison that matters is not you versus the median. It is you versus your future self, with the decisions you make today.
At 40, the typical UK household has most of its net worth tied up in property equity. The median for 40-49 year olds is £146,000 total, and a significant portion of that is the difference between the property value and the outstanding mortgage. The pension pot at this age typically sits between £50,000 and £80,000 for someone who has been contributing consistently since their twenties.
By 50, the picture shifts. Property equity tends to be larger as mortgages get paid down. Pension pots grow more quickly in the final decade before retirement due to compound growth. The median 50-59 year old has £260,000 in total net worth, with pensions representing a larger share.
This is the decade where the gap between people who started pension contributions at 25 and those who started at 35 becomes very visible. A 7% annual return on a pension started at 25 versus one started at 35 produces a difference of roughly 40% in the final pot size, even with identical contribution amounts.
The question most people ask is: am I normal?
If your net worth at 41 is between £100,000 and £200,000, you are within the normal range for your age. You are not obviously behind. You are not obviously ahead. You are in the range where the decisions you make in the next 10 years will determine whether you are comfortably positioned at 65 or scrambling to catch up.
If you are below £80,000 at 41, the question is not whether you are behind. The question is whether you have time to change the trajectory. The answer, in most cases, is yes. You have 24 years until the state pension age. That is a long time for compound growth to work, particularly if you can increase contributions when your income allows.
If you are above £250,000 at 41, you are in a strong position. The anxiety you feel about whether it is enough is understandable but often disproportionate. Use a retirement calculator to find out what your number actually is, rather than guessing.
Benchmarking only matters if it changes what you do next.
If you are 41 with £100,000 net worth and you have not looked at your pension contributions in three years, the most useful thing you can do this month is to log in to your workplace pension and check what you are contributing. Then calculate what you would need to contribute to be on track for a pension at 65 that covers your actual retirement spending.
If you are 41 with £200,000 and you are still anxious, the most useful thing is to run a retirement projection with your actual numbers. Often, the anxiety disappears once you see the projection. Sometimes it does not, and that is useful information too.
The benchmark tells you where you are. It does not tell you where you are going. Only your contributions and your plan can change that.
Connect your accounts and get clear on your actual net worth. No jargon, no pressure. Just honesty about where you are.
Net worth includes all assets (property equity, pension valuations, savings, investments, valuables) minus all debts (mortgage, loans, credit card balances). For a 40-year-old with a mortgage, property equity is typically the largest single component of net worth.
Net worth is one measure of wealth, but not the only one. It does not capture income potential, earning ability, or quality of life. Someone with £100,000 net worth and a high income is in a different position to someone with £100,000 net worth and no income. Net worth is a snapshot, not a complete picture.
No. The median is a benchmark, not a target. Below the median at 40 does not mean you will be below the median at 65. The decisions you make in the next 10 years matter more than where you are today. Increase your pension contributions when you can, and give compound growth time to work.
Averages are pulled up by extremely wealthy households. If Bill Gates walks into a pub, everyone in that pub becomes a billionaire on average. The median, where half are above and half are below, gives a more honest reflection of what a typical person has. ONS uses medians in their Wealth and Assets survey for exactly this reason.